<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clarence Thomas Archives - Flux</title>
	<atom:link href="https://flux.community/tag/clarence-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://flux.community/tag/clarence-thomas/</link>
	<description>A platform for change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Harlan Crow proves, once again, that the system is broken</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/joan-mccarter/2023/05/harlan-crow-proves-once-again-that-the-system-is-broken/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan McCarter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 22:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-democratic SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for play]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=13535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Harlan Crow, Texas real estate magnate and very dear friend of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has instructed his lawyer to tell yet another Senate committee to pound sand. Congress doesn’t have the authority to oversee the Supreme Court, the lawyer asserted in a response to the Judiciary Committee’s request for details of the millions of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/joan-mccarter/2023/05/harlan-crow-proves-once-again-that-the-system-is-broken/">Harlan Crow proves, once again, that the system is broken</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes bill to protect marriage equality, angering anti-equality activists</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/peter-montgomery/2022/07/house-passes-bill-to-protect-marriage-equality-angering-anti-equality-activists/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Montgomery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Research Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Starnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Perkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=11782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ call for the Supreme Court to review its “demonstrably erroneous” marriage equality ruling, the U.S. House of Representatives voted Tuesday to enshrine marriage rights for same-sex and interracial couples in federal law. Anti-equality activists and leaders fumed that 47 Republicans joined House Democrats to support the Respect for Marriage Act. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/peter-montgomery/2022/07/house-passes-bill-to-protect-marriage-equality-angering-anti-equality-activists/">House passes bill to protect marriage equality, angering anti-equality activists</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only one Republican Texas congress member voted to protect marriage equality</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/eric-neugeboren/2022/07/only-one-republican-texas-congress-member-voted-to-protect-marriage-equality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Neugeboren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipartisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Gonzalez]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=11773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost all U.S. House Republicans from Texas on Tuesday opposed formally codifying the right to same-sex marriage into federal law. Rep. Tony Gonzales of San Antonio was the only Texas Republican to vote for the legislation. Rep. Brian Babin of Woodville did not vote. The final vote was 267-157, with 47 Republicans joining all 220 Democrats in a rare [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/eric-neugeboren/2022/07/only-one-republican-texas-congress-member-voted-to-protect-marriage-equality/">Only one Republican Texas congress member voted to protect marriage equality</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court should roll back all privacy rights</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/julia-conley/2022/06/clarence-thomas-says-supreme-court-should-roll-back-all-privacy-rights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia Conley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 14:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=11378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas made clear in his concurring opinion regarding the overturning of Roe v. Wade that the high court has no intention of stopping its rollback of Americans&#8217; rights, naming cases that centered on marriage equality and the right to obtain contraception as previous rulings that should be revisited. &#8220;It does not end at abortion. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/julia-conley/2022/06/clarence-thomas-says-supreme-court-should-roll-back-all-privacy-rights/">Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court should roll back all privacy rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
