<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Archives - Flux</title>
	<atom:link href="https://flux.community/tag/kansas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://flux.community/tag/kansas/</link>
	<description>A platform for change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 01:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Progressives see midterm hopes rise on Kansas voters&#8217; defense of abortion rights</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/brett-wilkins/2022/08/progressives-see-midterm-hopes-rise-on-kansas-voters-defense-of-abortion-rights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022 midterms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first post-Roe abortion vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midterms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woman's right to control her own body]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=11940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The landslide defeat in Kansas of a constitutional amendment to revoke abortion rights is energizing reproductive freedom fighters, who on Wednesday expressed hopes that congressional Republicans will pay dearly in this November&#8217;s midterm elections for flouting the will of the majority of Americans. Had the Kansas amendment passed, it would have paved the way for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/brett-wilkins/2022/08/progressives-see-midterm-hopes-rise-on-kansas-voters-defense-of-abortion-rights/">Progressives see midterm hopes rise on Kansas voters&#8217; defense of abortion rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas voters reject effort to eliminate state abortion protections</title>
		<link>https://flux.community/shefali-luthra/2022/08/kansas-voters-reject-effort-to-eliminate-state-abortion-protections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shefali Luthra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion protections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-Roe U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://flux.community/?p=11924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the first abortion-related election since Roe v. Wade was overturned, Kansas have rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have specified that the right to terminate a pregnancy isn’t protected. Though votes are still being counted, Decision Desk HQ determined that the amendment has failed, preserving access to abortion in a state that has [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://flux.community/shefali-luthra/2022/08/kansas-voters-reject-effort-to-eliminate-state-abortion-protections/">Kansas voters reject effort to eliminate state abortion protections</a> appeared first on <a href="https://flux.community">Flux</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
